ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • コミュニティ
  • ランキング
AND
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

{"_buckets": {"deposit": "f8695058-6297-40a6-9dd5-b8d90e3023fa"}, "_deposit": {"id": "6506", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "6506"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:kitami-it.repo.nii.ac.jp:00006506"}, "item_2_alternative_title_18": {"attribute_name": "\u305d\u306e\u4ed6\u306e\u30bf\u30a4\u30c8\u30eb", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "On the Function of Criticism -Its Three Viewpoints-"}]}, "item_2_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "\u66f8\u8a8c\u60c5\u5831", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "1981-01", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "1", "bibliographicPageEnd": "137", "bibliographicPageStart": "131", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "12", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "\u5317\u898b\u5de5\u696d\u5927\u5b66\u7814\u7a76\u5831\u544a"}]}]}, "item_2_description_14": {"attribute_name": "\u30d5\u30a9\u30fc\u30de\u30c3\u30c8", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "application/pdf", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_2_description_4": {"attribute_name": "\u6284\u9332", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "\u201cThe critical power is of lower rank than\u3000the creative,\u201d wrote Matthew Arnold in 1864 in his essay \u201cThe Function of Criticism at the Present Time.\u201d He said in it that the function of literary criticism lies in the making of \u201can intellectual situation of which the creative power can profitably avail itself.\u201d Ever since a great number of essays under the same or similar title have been written both by artists and critics. As literature came to be taught in colleges or universities in this century, literary criticism began to call for its own theory so as to be taught and conveyed to the students as a conceptual knowledge and as a structure of thought. In this paper I introduce some of the essays on the function of literary criticism written since the time of Matthew Arnold up to the present day and try to explicate three different viewpoints among them. Those who belong to the first group share the view that literary criticism is a secondary or subordinate activity to the creative which, to use the word by T.S. Eliot, is an \u201cautotelic\u201d activity. J.E. Spingarn, on the other hand, reminded us of the \u201ccreative function\u201d of criticism and insisted on the necessity of the \u201cnew criticism\u201d in 1910. Those in the second group reject the view that literary criticism is a kind of parasite on literature and try to establish its own theory and principles which are of practical use in the application. The third group is not the corresponding or counterpart view of the first and the second. Rather its standpoint can be said to bean another way of approach to literary criticism. The conspicuous method is the use of already established learnings such as psychology, philosophy, or history in the excercise of literary exposition and judgement. But after all, a part of what Matthew Arnold said, his expectation, still holds true. He insisted that criticism must be \u201cbound to a joint action and working to a common result.\u201d The view is transmitted through T.S. Eliot to F.R. Leavis. Although the second group may seem to hasten in the pursuit of the logical and conceptual knowledge of criticism, in is a necessary step toward the systematic knowledge about literature which wil be the common result. \u3000", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_2_full_name_3": {"attribute_name": "\u8457\u8005\u5225\u540d", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "32857", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}], "names": [{"name": "Harumi, HIRANO"}]}]}, "item_2_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "\u51fa\u7248\u8005", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "\u5317\u898b\u5de5\u696d\u5927\u5b66"}]}, "item_2_select_15": {"attribute_name": "\u8457\u8005\u7248\u30d5\u30e9\u30b0", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "\u8457\u8005", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "\u5e73\u91ce, \u6e29\u7f8e"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "32856", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "\u30d5\u30a1\u30a4\u30eb\u60c5\u5831", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2016-11-22"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "12-1-13.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "3.1 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 3100000.0, "url": {"label": "12-1-13.pdf", "url": "https://kitami-it.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/6506/files/12-1-13.pdf"}, "version_id": "aafb3952-a5bf-4c1e-b0bb-d6ee86a1591a"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "\u8a00\u8a9e", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "\u8cc7\u6e90\u30bf\u30a4\u30d7", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "\u6279\u8a55\u306e\u6a5f\u80fd\u306b\u3064\u3044\u3066 -\u305d\u306e\u4e09\u3064\u306e\u7acb\u5834-", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "\u30bf\u30a4\u30c8\u30eb", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "\u6279\u8a55\u306e\u6a5f\u80fd\u306b\u3064\u3044\u3066 -\u305d\u306e\u4e09\u3064\u306e\u7acb\u5834-"}]}, "item_type_id": "2", "owner": "1", "path": ["7/15/33"], "permalink_uri": "https://kitami-it.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/6506", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "\u516c\u958b\u65e5", "attribute_value": "2007-04-09"}, "publish_date": "2007-04-09", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "6506", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["\u6279\u8a55\u306e\u6a5f\u80fd\u306b\u3064\u3044\u3066 -\u305d\u306e\u4e09\u3064\u306e\u7acb\u5834-"], "weko_shared_id": 3}
  1. 紀要掲載論文
  2. 北見工業大学研究報告
  3. Vol.12

批評の機能について -その三つの立場-

https://kitami-it.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/6506
3413d7c3-c6a2-47c9-b0de-151da32f3941
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
12-1-13.pdf 12-1-13.pdf (3.1 MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2007-04-09
タイトル
タイトル 批評の機能について -その三つの立場-
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル On the Function of Criticism -Its Three Viewpoints-
著者 平野, 温美

× 平野, 温美

WEKO 32856

平野, 温美

Search repository
著者別名
識別子
識別子 32857
識別子Scheme WEKO
姓名
姓名 Harumi, HIRANO
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 “The critical power is of lower rank than the creative,” wrote Matthew Arnold in 1864 in his essay “The Function of Criticism at the Present Time.” He said in it that the function of literary criticism lies in the making of “an intellectual situation of which the creative power can profitably avail itself.” Ever since a great number of essays under the same or similar title have been written both by artists and critics. As literature came to be taught in colleges or universities in this century, literary criticism began to call for its own theory so as to be taught and conveyed to the students as a conceptual knowledge and as a structure of thought. In this paper I introduce some of the essays on the function of literary criticism written since the time of Matthew Arnold up to the present day and try to explicate three different viewpoints among them. Those who belong to the first group share the view that literary criticism is a secondary or subordinate activity to the creative which, to use the word by T.S. Eliot, is an “autotelic” activity. J.E. Spingarn, on the other hand, reminded us of the “creative function” of criticism and insisted on the necessity of the “new criticism” in 1910. Those in the second group reject the view that literary criticism is a kind of parasite on literature and try to establish its own theory and principles which are of practical use in the application. The third group is not the corresponding or counterpart view of the first and the second. Rather its standpoint can be said to bean another way of approach to literary criticism. The conspicuous method is the use of already established learnings such as psychology, philosophy, or history in the excercise of literary exposition and judgement. But after all, a part of what Matthew Arnold said, his expectation, still holds true. He insisted that criticism must be “bound to a joint action and working to a common result.” The view is transmitted through T.S. Eliot to F.R. Leavis. Although the second group may seem to hasten in the pursuit of the logical and conceptual knowledge of criticism, in is a necessary step toward the systematic knowledge about literature which wil be the common result.
書誌情報 北見工業大学研究報告

巻 12, 号 1, p. 131-137, 発行日 1981-01
フォーマット
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 application/pdf
著者版フラグ
値 publisher
出版者
出版者 北見工業大学
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 06:51:08.577688
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley CiteULike Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

Export

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by CERN Data Centre & Invenio


Powered by CERN Data Centre & Invenio