@article{oai:kitami-it.repo.nii.ac.jp:00006547,
 author = {中村, 陽一 and 山城, 迪},
 issue = {2},
 journal = {北見工業大学研究報告},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {application/pdf, In　the references 1), 2), we reported the optimum operation scheduling method which would satisfy the many constraints such as the different acceptable levels of pollution at each area, and the constraints imposed by the different quantities of the different types of fuel used. In this paper, this method is called the approximate method. In the references 3), 4), we reported the optimum operation scheduling method which would satisfy a global emission constraint of each area. We call this the strict method in this paper. Another method which uses the dynamic programming method was reported in references 5). In this paper, we compare these methods of calculation. These methods are applied to a model system, and our results are summarized as follows. The approximate method is 3?60 times superior to the other methods concerning the calculating time and memory domain. Moreover, the calculating error of the approximate method is only 0?0.3％. The Strict method and DP method can not satisfy the many constrints because of their increasing quantity of calculations. But using our method, it is possible to satisfy these constraints.},
 pages = {169--180},
 title = {一次エネルギーの供給制約及び環境規制を考慮した電力系統の最適運用計画 (第5報)* -近似解法、厳密解法及びDP法の比較-},
 volume = {14},
 year = {1983}
}